I’m a big fan of the research and consumer perspectives from The Hartman Group. Food is their specialty, but their ideas can be applied to credit unions.

For example, look at their recent comparison of traditional culture, passed down from our teachers and authorities, to the consumer culture, which bubbled up and is shaping the way younger credit union prospects receive our message. We must become aware of the differences to change with the times.

Traditional Culture Consumer Culture
Strong parental and intergenerational authority Families run as democracies
Clear societal roles (i.e., dad, worker) Less regard for elders
Belief in rules, hierarchies Multiple, transient value systems
Belief in science, objectivity [The magazine did not list a consumer culture element in this section]
Top-down authority Skeptical of authority systems
Class-based lifestyles Lifestyle identities replace class identity
Focus on basic needs Focus on experience and desires rather than needs
Production drives economy Consumption drives economy
Sober and serious Playful, ironic, cynical
Source: The Hartman Group and Grocery Headquarters Magazine

 

If you agree with The Hartman Group’s shift, what beliefs about credit union marketing, communications and operations should we hold dear? What should we let go? What should we adopt?

In our financial literacy efforts, are credit unions coming off as a “strong parental” voice or are our programs featuring peers speaking to peers like the television show Biz Kid$? How do we structure financial literacy materials with messages reflecting our new knowledge that families run as democracies?

Our credit unions re-appoint long-standing board members who are hard-working, respected, and often retired. Do uncontested elections leading to appointments work with a culture that values democracy? Does the image of the tenured board member work with a consumer culture that has less regard for sober and serious elders and prefers to be playful, ironic and cynical? Target stores’ marketing is aimed at a young consumer with advertising that is playful and ironic, but it attracts shoppers young and old. Could it be that reflecting the current social norms of our consumer culture works? Is it possible that the advertising reflecting the cultural norm makes people comfortable while also being edgy and enticing them to shop at the store?

The credit union marketing and operations archtype is that we have to be traditional and rule-based, because people have to trust us with their money. Yes, they do, but trust in a not-for-profit financial institution a given. Do we honestly think that in the back of their minds consumers who spend thousands online don’t trust credit unions with their money?

Do we traditionally focus on basic needs like car loans, savings and checking? Of course. But could we convey the information to consumers in a way that reflects their lifestyles, experience and desires…real desires? That 21-year prospect may lust after a turbocharged 2008 Cobalt and barely make payments. Is he a good member? Wouldn’t he also benefit from peer-to-peer financial literacy? Wouldn’t he be more likely to listen to someone like him than an authority figure telling him that he’s making bad choices?

Let’s not start our marketing discussion with, “Our best member is…” and ignore who tomorrow’s best member is.

Do we believe that prospects will flock to us because we tell them logically that they will become owners/members and they have a say in what we deliver?

We’ve had the pleasure of working with Seattle Metropolitan Credit Union, and they get the shift from traditional culture to consumer culture.

They encourage young members to vote on everything from the design of their debit card to the causes Seattle Metro should donate to. Their “Speak” and “Seven Principles” programs don’t disrespect traditional culture, but definitely take root in the consumer principles articulated by Hartman.